Comments on: Advanced Control Flow – Switch Statements http://talkbinary.com/programming/c/advanced-control-flow-switch-statements/ Programming Resources, Technology, Computers Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:52:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Rarst http://talkbinary.com/programming/c/advanced-control-flow-switch-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-250 Rarst Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:29:55 +0000 http://talkbinary.com/?p=728#comment-250 Missed accumulating rewards part. :) Bit weird to give all three medals together. :) Missed accumulating rewards part. :) Bit weird to give all three medals together. :)

]]> By: Diego http://talkbinary.com/programming/c/advanced-control-flow-switch-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-249 Diego Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:17:35 +0000 http://talkbinary.com/?p=728#comment-249 The absence of breaks was to stress the fact that for a situation like the one I posted above, a switch statement looks more cleaner, than else if statements. In other words, if you hit case 1, you'll get case 2 and case 3 because there are no break statements before that. The absence of breaks was to stress the fact that for a situation like the one I posted above, a switch statement looks more cleaner, than else if statements.

In other words, if you hit case 1, you’ll get case 2 and case 3 because there are no break statements before that.

]]> By: Rarst http://talkbinary.com/programming/c/advanced-control-flow-switch-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-228 Rarst Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:02:28 +0000 http://talkbinary.com/?p=728#comment-228 Clearly not enough breaks in last piece of code. :) Clearly not enough breaks in last piece of code. :)

]]>